On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
> two different explanations. how can we find out which one is closer to
> the truth?
What truth? What makes you think there couldn't be even more factors like
religous, economic, or raw resource issues as well.
Quit looking for easy answers.
> and again there's the question of whether an ideal should be followed if
> it is proven to be so volatile.
Not sure what you mean by volatile in this context. All ideas are
volatile.
____________________________________________________________________
The future is downloading. Can you hear the impact?
O[rphan] D[rift>]
Cyber Positive
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! ... Sunder
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Sunder
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Jim Choate
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: ... Jim Burnes
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was... Missouri FreeNet Administration
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! ... Tom Vogt
- Political realities (was &quo... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... Tom Vogt
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... mgraffam
