"Secret Squirrel" writes:
> Asked by a newspaper reporter from the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune
> why she did not fight harder against the searching of home computers,
> she said the union had nothing to hide and �we believe there was enough
> privacy protection.�
Bwahahahahahahahah!
First of all, the union has no business bending over for a search of the
home computers of its individual members.
Second, in the unlikely event that a search of someone's home computer
would be justified, the court should appoint a special master to examine
the computer, copy specific material clearly defined by the court as
having relevance to the case at hand, and turn it over to the court
without disclosing other material on the computer which is none of the
court's fucking business.
Handing peoples home computers to "forensics experts" hired by their
employers, without redacting everything unrelated to their employment, is
the very definition of fishing expeditions, unreasonable search and
seizure, and invasion of personal privacy.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
