Black Unicorn wrote: >Since when do the conditions of [Mitnick's] release permit him to wear a lapel mic? Reese wrote: > >> It's pursuant to approval by his probation officer. > >> > >> R. Black Unicorn wrote: > >sar-casm n [F or LL] 1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance > >designed to cut or give pain 2 a: a mode of satirical wit > depending for its > >effect on bitter, caustic and often ironic language that is usu. directed > >against an individual b: the use or language of sarcasm. Reese wrote: > A strict reading of his probation terms parries your "Duh." and I riposte, > with my usual aplomb as I say, you haven't read the probation terms, have > you? Disengage - Remise: I have indeed. In some detail. I had a personal and perhaps professional interest in this case, not to mention that I find the terms amusing. The entire point of my sarcasm was that clearly the probation terms were overreached and would never be taken seriously by anyone, including Mitnik. That the sensationalism of the case has contributed to a farce. Implications on his livelihood and civil rights are (which bear on the sarcasm) better left to another forum. I've been watching your rants for some time. Since I actually had to explain all this to you it seems you really are as dense as they suggest. > Fuck Off. And an accomplished vulgarian as well it would seem. How quaint. No wonder the CIA is so interested in you.
