On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: >>You might want to subscribe to cygwin-developers to know what is >>scheduled, or look in the archives. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the general >>discussion forum, and cygwin-apps is for ported applications. >>Setup.exe is neither. > >I don't subscribe to cygwin-developpers as I'm *not* a developper (I >regret it but *really* don't have time to), don't want my mailbox to be >more filled than it already is (not counting the fact that it's not an >open list IIRC), but setup.exe seems to be discussed so often on the >general list that... Hmm, and cygwin1.dll is discussed here, too, so... And, we discuss releases here quite a lot... I've seen mount mentioned on a regular basis... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Christopher Faylor
- RE: Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Bobby McNulty
- RE: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Warren Young
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug John Marshall
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Christopher Faylor
- RE: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Robert Collins
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Christopher Faylor
- RE: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Christopher Faylor
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Michael F. March
- RE: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Alex Malinovich
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Charles S. Wilson
- Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug Michael Schaap
