On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 6 09:01, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>> According to the RFC (2553), the specific behavior here is not defined: > Microsoft's getnameinfo man page conveniently notes that this is the desired > behaviour according to section 6.2 of RFC 3493. Whups! I was looking at an obsolete RFC. My mistake. Sure enough, 3493 says If the service's name cannot be located, the numeric form of the service address (for example, its port number) shall be returned instead of its name. I'll go back to lurking now. -- Mark J. Reed <markjr...@gmail.com> -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
