On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:10:52PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >2009/7/24 Christopher Faylor: >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 07:54:50PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >>>But segv handling is mandatory for decent performance and only >>>stack overflow handling corrupts the cygwin stack. >> >> I can't grok that sentence. ?Are you reporting a bug? > >Sorry, I understood that wrong. I thought Eric reported the bug that >installing the libsigsegv *stack overflow* handler corrupted the cygwin >SEH chain with Win2008. Not the *segv* handler. > >But then I learned that indeed a Win2008 exception causes another SEGV >to be delayed >(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2009-07/msg00092.html) >and this fools the segv handler, not the stack handler.
Thanks for the clarification. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
