On Jul 21 15:58, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jul 21 07:04, Eric Blake wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > It seems like it would be pretty easy to add several new close-on-exec > > features required by POSIX 2008: > > > > open(name, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC); > > // skips the need to use fcntl > > > > fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC); > > // like F_DUPFD, but closes window without having to use > > // fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, fcntl(fd, F_GETFD)) > > > > and those provided by glibc as extensions: > > > > fopen(name, "re"); > > // like fopen "r", but with cloexec set > > > > The argument is that in multi-threaded apps, if one thread opens a file > > but has not yet turned on the close-on-exec bit while another thread does > > a fork-and-exec, then you leaked the fd into the child; and these new > > flags close the window. > > > > Should I go ahead and prepare a patch for the newlib side? > > It's not that easy to implement, especially not the fcntl which requires > to redefine the dup2 methods throughout to allow atomic operation on the > target OS handles. open (O_CLOEXEC) is much easier. Anyway, can we > wait until after Cygwin 1.7.1?
...which is to say, I added it to my TODO list. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple