Dave Korn wrote:
Vinod Gupta wrote:
When I do "ls -lR /cygdrive/z" it takes very long.
There are only about 700 files on Z: totalling only 100 MB. When I
monitor network counters on laptop, I see that a whopping 90 MB were
downloaded for a payload (file list) of only 60 KB. Out of curiosity, I
did the same experiment between two linux machines configured as NFS
client+server.
Perhaps more instructive would be to compare with typing "DIR Z:" in a DOS
prompt. How much time does that take, and how much network traffic does it
generate, by comparison?
If the OP is looking for truer comparisons with Linux, I would say that
using SAMBA on Linux is a better test than NFS. Of course, Cygwin is
expected to be slower than Linux regardless.
In terms of overall time/traffic with Cygwin, I'd recommend comparing the
results of "DIR Z:" that Dave recommends above to "ls /cygdrive/z" (or
"DIR /S Z:" to "ls -R /cygdrive/z"). If you need to use "-l" with "ls"
and remote SAMBA shares, I'd recommend adding "smbntsec" to your "CYGWIN"
environment variable. This should limit file accesses that "-l" (and other
flags) can require. See the link below for more info:
<http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html>
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
