I am forwarding this email from the boost mailing list.
I basically says that the next version of the boost filesystem library
(a well known library for C++ programming at www.boost.org) will not
compile on cygwin because of the lack of wide character support.
What can be done to make gcc/g++ standard conformant on this point so
that C++ programmers can continue to use cygwin?

F. Bron

boost-boun...@lists.boost.org a écrit sur 13/01/2009 15:16:02 :
> I've decided not to attempt support for Cygwin in the next version of
> Boost.Filesystem.
>
> Cygwin's lack of library support for wchar_t is the problem . For the
> current Boost.Filesystem version (v2), the necessary workarounds are so
> pervasive that the implementation code is much harder to read and
> maintain. Witness the number of bug reports that are Cygwin specific.
> For v3, currently under development, trying to support Cygwin would be
> even harder, and would cause a serious delay in development. Plus I'm
> tired of waiting for the cygwin folks to come into full C++ conformance.
>
> IIUC, the reason Cygwin doesn't provide C++ standard library support for
> wchar_t is that the underlying C library is missing the C wchar_t
> functions. Perhaps Boosters who care about Cygwin could spearhead an
> effort to add the missing C support? The needed functionality isn't all
> that complex; the main problem might be just learning enough about how
> Cygwin/GCC is configured and built to be able to add a fairy small
> number of C functions.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Beman

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to