Eric Blake wrote: > That's with /. What about with \? The cygwin dll sometimes treats the > two separators differently, where using \ is more likely to bypass cygwin > checks.
Don't forget the other variants, like \\.\c:\foo\bar \\./c:/foo/bar \??\c:\foo\bar \??/c:\foo\bar \??/c:/foo/bar Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
