2008/8/14 hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 8/14/08, Reini Urban <feed-for-spammers> wrote:
See http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR >> Tim McDaniel schrieb: >> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, hce <feeds-the-spammers> wrote: >> > > On 8/13/08, Reini Urban <feed-for-spammers> wrote: >> > > > I would try rebase with -v (verbose) and also tie it to a log file. >> > > > $ rebaseall -v | tie rebaseall.log >> > > >> > > There is no tie command >> > > >> > >> > Reini must have meant the "tee" command. It's intended to be a >> > T-joint, metaphorically: it copies all its input to the filename >> > argument and also to its standard output. It's most commonly used to >> > saving output into a log file while also monitoring it as it is >> > generated, as intended here. >> > >> >> Sorry. tee is what I meant of course. >> I'm obviously doing too much perl tie'ng lately. >> >> The error is most likely a running cygwin service. >> But since cygcheck was run from cmd.exe, not from bash, and >> C:\Tools\Cygwin\bin not in the path we cannot tell for sure. >> >> For the disturbing cygcheck message "Windows Longhorn/Vista (not yet >> supported!) Ver 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1" only Corinna can tell. >> AFAIK it should work ok. >> But I haven't tested it on Vista, as I have no Vista nowhere. > > Thanks all responses. I can ensure you there were only two processes > ps and ash as I reboot the machine before doing ash rebaseall. Anyway, > I've tried again to call rebaseall | tee rebaseall.log, then run > cygcheck -s -v -r > cygcheck.log in DOS terminal. Please see attached > all files. Don't use tee as Dave explained. You will miss the two tee.exe dependent dll's then: cygintl-8.dll and cygiconv-2.dll Are there any cygwin services? I see none, but rebaseall complains. Can you post the output of the process test within ash please. Before you did it with cmd.exe > C:\Cygwin\Tools\bin\ash $ ./grep -E -i -v '/ash(.exe)?$' /proc/[0-9]*/exename > Will the Vista a problem as you mentioned above? > Windows Longhorn/Vista (not yet supported!) Ver 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 Not for perl and fork, but for running rebaseall probably. And for the perl rebase baselevel I provided in the perl package. Vista dll's seem to occupy much more space than I tought. Can someone with Vista please try a rebaseall? I'd need the last base address then, that I can prepare better rebased perl dll's. As workaround please try the following within bash. But I (and Jason) really want to know why this this simple grep test fails for you. # For perl I rebased from 0x50000000 upwards. # Normally it goes for all cygwin dlls from 0x70000000 downwards. # Since we have no Vista result what is the last base, maybe its # already below 0x50000000 for some conflicting dll, we try it lower # And I don't know how far upwards the Vista dll go. echo /bin/cygperl5_10.dll > /tmp/rebase.lst find /usr/lib/perl5 -name \*.dll >> /tmp/rebase.lst rebase -v -b 0x480000000 -o 0x10000 -T /tmp/rebase.lst -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
