On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 08:48:18PM -0400, Francis Litterio wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >>>Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port? >>The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense. You >>need to do a bit more homework. I suggest you start by reading the >>first sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/. > >Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor? >Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform.
Would it help if I vowed not to port Cygwin to the Itanium? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
