> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:34 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Source distribution problem with core library > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:39:19PM -0400, Don Porges wrote: > >I think that the installable source tar.gz file of > cygwin-1.5.25-15 is > >not what it's supposed to be. > > > >I installed the latest (non-cvs) source using setup.exe, > which got me > >cygwin-1.5.25-15-src.tar.bz2. The specific source file that I care > >about right now is winsup/cygwin/path.cc. By comparing it > to the cvs > >repsository, I can see that the file in the tarball must be > at least 2 > >years old. (The function I was looking at is > conv_path_list(), and the > >change that might address my problem was made in 1.414, in August of > >2006; it's not in the released source file.) The > copywrights seem to > >have been kept up-to-date in the cvs version; the one in the > tarball is > >labeled no later than 2006. > > > >Futhermore, the winsup/cygwin directory in the tarball has Changelog > >files only up through 2005; no 2006 or 2007. The current > Changelog with > >2008 fixes is there. The repository has the files for 2006 > and 2007. > >So something seems wrong. I also looked at 1.5.25-14; same story. > >(And I looked on more than one mirror site, just to be sure.) > > Extracted from cygwin-1.5.25-15/winsup/cygwin/ChangeLog in > the cygwin-1.5.25-15-src.tar.bz2 > file: > > 2008-06-12 Corinna Vinschen <corinna...> > > * fhandler_console.cc (fhandler_console::open): Set > console state last. > Only add ENABLE_PROCESSED_INPUT flag if this is the > first time we open > the console. > > 2008-04-17 Corinna Vinschen <corinna...> > > * dtable.cc (dtable::init_std_file_from_handle): Fix > pipe related test. > > > The cygwin source tarball is correct. There is no guarantee > that what you see in CVS will match what is released. The > CVS trunk is where active cygwin 1.7.x development is going > on. 1.5.25 is generated on a separate branch entirely and > sees very little development. > > cgf
Thanks -- I didn't realize about the branching. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
