On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:17:42PM -0400, Ralph Hempel wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >>Well, it needs a little debugging first, but it shouldn't be tricky to >>bash into shape. > >Sorry for taking so long, but here's what we have so far. The "newer" >patch referred to by Reini is against but the patch is against 2.590 >which looks like it's a bout 2 point releases behind the current >version in the 1.7 tree for setup. > >The current "released" version of setup is 2.573.2.2 > >So the question is, if I'm going to look at patching setup to accept a >list of packages on the command line, then which version should we be >merging the patches against?
If you are going to be discussing setup development you should subscribe to the cygwin-apps mailing list. I can't speak for the setup.exe developers but I suspect that you should be just using the CVS head for all of your development. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
