On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:55:33PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Tom Hall on 2/24/2007 1:40 PM: >>I think there's a bug in the Cygwin setup >> >>The problem turned out to be that the version of mutt.exe I got was >>looking for /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll and /usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.7.dll >>but setup.exe sent me /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll and >>/usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.8.dll. After copying the .7 versions from another >>machine, mutt seems to be working fine :-). > >Actually, it means that Corinna's statement that "None of the packages >in the Cygwin net distribution is built against openssl 0.9.7 anymore." >in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2007-02/msg00016.html is wrong. >The mutt maintainer needs to upload a new package in order to correct >this. Meanwhile, I will let Corinna or the mutt maintainer decide if >the mutt setup.hint should be adjusted to point to openssl097 >compatibility package instead of openssl.
I'm in the process of generating a new mutt package now. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
