On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:29:18AM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote: >On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Jan 13 00:22, Christopher Layne wrote: >>>The real question I have is why was what *should* have worked, not >>>working? >> >>That has been answered immediately in the replies: >>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00093.html >>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00095.html >>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00097.html >> > >Okay, I'll file this under "looks like this is it, so it's probably >it." > >A little less snark - a little more acceptance and understanding goes a >long way.
You could also file it under "In a long running discussion, reading responses and asking for specific clarification is better than just asking general questions which seem to imply that you haven't been paying attention." YMMV. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
