Hi everyone, I'd just like to report that this issue has been resolved. It would seem that my Cygwin installation had never completed properly. A fresh installation fixed the issue.
Hugh On 21/10/06, Hugh McMaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brian, > > I apologise for the lack of information that I have provided in my > previous message. > > Portaudio provides the ability to create cross platform audio I/O > libraries ( http://www.portaudio.com). That aside, I am using the > latest version of Cygwin (all stable release packages), and the latest > version of Portaudio. > > To configure, compile, and install Portaudio in Cygwin, I used > './configure', then 'make', and then finally 'make install'. The > process went perfectly, apart from the need to use 'autoreconf' before > starting the process to recreate the 'configure' file. I have > attempted using Portaudio with static libraries, and also shared > libraries. > > Everytime I start my binary, I always end up with that exception fault > displayed in my previous message. I will run the debug sequence, and > have a look at what is going on. > > Hugh > > On 21/10/06, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hugh McMaster wrote: > > > > > I can successfully compile and install Portaudio in Cygwin (after > > > performing autoreconf). I have been using dynamic libraries > > > (specifically cygportaudio-2.dll) I can even compile my own sources. > > > When attempting to run the resulting Win32 binary, I get an error, > > > that I cannot even begin to make sense of. > > > > I have no idea what portaudio is, and I'm sure I'm not alone. It's not > > an official Cygwin package. I'm sure I could google it, and find its > > homepage, and read a little bit about it, and maybe dig around and find > > a tarball somewhere. > > > > Even if I had that information I have no idea what options, methods, or > > patches you used to compile it, or what commands or options you used to > > invoke it, or what files you supplied as input, or really what you were > > trying to do with it. In other words, you've given almost no useful > > information. It's kind of the analog of walking into a room of complete > > strangers and asking, "Hey does anyone know what's up with Steve?" > > (Who's Steve?) > > > > > Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=0048C2C0 > > > > This means there was an access violation exception. This is Windows-ese > > for "Segmentation fault". It is a generic error that occurs when a > > process tries to access a page of memory that it does not have access > > to. This can be caused by hundreds of different things - dereferencing > > a NULL or otherwise uninitialized pointer, walking off the end of an > > unterminated buffer, stack corruption, and on and on. It is a very > > generic symptom of a bug in the code, or a logic error in the code, or > > false assumptions about the environment the code will be executing in, > > or any number of other problems. > > > > In other words, you'll have to actually debug the program. The address > > of the fault (0x004xxxxx) does imply that it is happening in the main > > binary image and not a DLL, but that's not a given either. Compile with > > debugging symbols (-g) and use gdb and figure out what's going on. Or > > use the error_start parameter of $CYGWIN to launch the debugger at the > > fault instead of the default action of creating the .stackdump file. > > > > > Stack trace: > > > Frame Function Args > > > 5ED4CCB8 0048C2C0 (00000000, 00290A60, 00001000, 67144A5D) > > > 5ED4CCF8 67145B1F (002848E0, 5ED4CD5C, 002917F0, 00000002) > > > 5ED4CDB8 671498A5 (00284890, 5ED4CDF0, 671496B0, 5ED4CDF0) > > > 671496B0 61004416 (00ACEC81, 4D8B0000, 9445C708, 00000000) > > > > A naked stack trace of self-compiled code does not do any good. We have > > no idea what those addresses correspond to. > > > > > Does anyone know what is wrong with the library file that has been > > > created on Cygwin? Should I completely reinstall Cygwin? > > > > Please forgive the following analogy. > > > > Reinstalling is the equivalent of popping the hood, staring at the > > engine for a while, then closing the hood and trying to turn it over > > again -- it doesn't actually do anything to fix the underlying problem, > > unless that problem was a loose hood. And if it does work it was a > > coincidence, just as sometimes letting the engine cool off will allow it > > to start again. But in those cases it would have also worked if you had > > just sat there for a while twiddling your thumbs and so it certainly > > wasn't due to opening the hood and staring. > > > > Brian >
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/