mwoehlke <mwoehlke <at> tibco.com> writes: > > Eric Blake wrote: > > Second, this release adds a new shopt, igncr, which dynamically > > tells bash to ignore all \r in the input file when it is set; however, it > > defaults to unset. > > So, I keep wanting to know if you are thinking about submitting this > upstream (or have you done so already?)... >
I'm hoping to port the patches to the 3.2 beta before proposing them upstream (right now, my cygwin TODO list includes: get coreutils 6.3 stable ported to cygwin, get bash 3.2beta ported to cygwin as experimental, post bash patches upstream, update bash-completion to use cygport and add some long overdue promised completion functions for cygwin). As written, my patch is conditionalized on __CYGWIN__, but when proposing it upstream, I will try to make it more generic. -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
