Dave Korn wrote:
On 26 September 2006 05:22, Artie Ziff wrote:
I recently experienced a similar scenario, posted a general description
of the user experience (with some questions) in an attempt to elicit
general comments. I rcv'd the same response as those before me... as is
evidenced in the archives. That is, no response. I suppose the
philosophy is: if there is no response then no problem exists. ;-)
Nope. The philosophy is: if there is no information, then no diagnosis can
be made.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cygchecks, gentlemen, please. As attachments, please. Let's see what
you've got so far, and then later we might need to look at setup logs and
suchlike.
cheers,
DaveK
I wonder if perhaps they think they can't run cygcheck because they
haven't finished installing cygwin yet?
It does seem that many people are unaware that cygcheck is a native
win32 binary...
Chris
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
