On Aug 14 11:03, mwoehlke wrote: > It sounds to me like what you want to do is release a GPL version of > your work. [...] But it sounds like this is inadequate?
For inclusion into Cygwin, yes, it's inadequate. The buyout license as mentioned in the last paragraph on http://cygwin.com/licensing.html disallows usage of GPL'ed code in Cygwin. For similar reasons glibc is under LGPL. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
