On Jul 14 12:16, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year? > > > The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was > dated 20060707. > > Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.
Actually, we're trying to get the DLL out as soon as possible. But you know what happens. Every time we prepare a snapshot and really want to get it done, somebody jumps up from behind a shrub and cries "Hey, I have a totally new bug here!". So, we're just not quite finshed. Stay tuned. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
