> >It looks like d_ino is not being correctly populated within //. > >Running the program below on snapshot 20060220 produced: > > A (somewhat) simple test case (patent pending) is nice but it really > should be accompanied with an explanation of the problem. How about > describing *in words* what you think is broken?
It looks like Corinna already nailed the issue, but for the archive's sake, my complaint was that under //, d_ino and st_ino did not match properly. With the 20060227 snapshot (or whenever the next one is), the same test program should now output: Searching for //eblake, inode 10556217422951964268 match found at entry 553 -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
