On Nov 10 13:33, Scott Finneran wrote: > Hello Igor, > > Thankyou for your reply. Firstly, yes I should have done a bit more > reading before posting. I did as you suggested and downloaded the latest > snapshot (winsup-src-20051108). > > The problem that I experienced before still exists in the latest > snapshot. sigrelse() is defined in winsup/cygwin/exceptions.cc but is > not declared in signal.h (sighold() etc. are all declared here). > > Producing a patch to fix this issue is a trivial task which I am more > than happy to do. However, as this situation (defined but not declared) > is such a show-stopper and cygwin always seems to be well tested I > assumed that it was not a bug but some kind of a feature. > > In other words, is the function implemented but not defined > intentionally to prevent people from using it for some unspecified reason? > > Any insight would be appreciated.
See my reply to cygwin-patches. It was just a missing prototype. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
