On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> [Ugh. Duplicate response. Duly noted.]
Yes, it is. And within 5.5 minutes, no less. Shouldn't there be a grace
period? :-)
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:36:55AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
^^^^^^^^
> >If you're attempting to have patch interpret the paths in the patch
> >file then, as Eric said, you need to specify the "-p" option. In the
> >above case, specifying "patch -p0 <1.tm" will cause old/file to be
> >patched. This is the case on both linux and cygwin.
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:42:13AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
^^^^^^^^
> >You need to use "patch -p0 <1.tm".
FWIW, my response did ask the OP why he thought Windows paths were an
issue, as well as having a thinly veiled RTFM... :-)
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. /DA
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
