On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:36:56AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Christopher Faylor on 6/18/2005 9:45 AM: >> IMO, the posted check for fifos is flawed in that it assumes that >> writing to a fifo will not block if there is no reader on the fifo. >> That's not true for cygwin. > >The posted check for fifos used the O_NONBLOCK flag when opening the fifo >for writing,
Oops. I missed that. Yes, that's a cygwin bug. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
