On 5/10/05, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:06:36AM -0400, William M. (Mike) Miller wrote: > >I'm still left with the problem of figuring out what changed to cause > >this result. Until I ran the "setup" application last Friday, I was > >seeing output from static destructors, and now I don't. It would > >save me a lot of work to be able to restore the old behavior, but I > >don't know what was responsible for this change. > > Just as a wild guess, does explicitly calling exit help at all?
Yes, the output does appear when I call exit instead of returning from main(). Unfortunately, that's not an option. For one thing, this is shared code that works just fine on other systems (and under Cygwin until I updated last Friday). For another, the semantics of calling exit in main() are not exactly the same as returning from main() -- local automatic objects in main() are not destroyed by the exit() call, which is something some of this code that is now failing relies on. Thanks for the suggestion, though. -- William M. (Mike) Miller | Edison Design Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
