Christopher Faylor wrote: > reported that it was still broken in the cygwin-developers mailing list. > That's why it is only fixed in the snapshot. I'm glad to see that it > is now ok but it makes me wonder what else I now broke. :-)
I still have not given up on trying to come up with a decent testcase for that, btw. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
