"Christopher Faylor" wrote:

>>> > If you're not using the -17 (test) version of bash, try that.
>>>
>>> Wow!  Much better!  My scripts are still churning after 4 hours.
>>> When will this be part of an offical cygwin drop?
>>Well, it's already "official"
>
> FWIW, I've removed -17 from test status.
>

Thanks.

But, had the problem show up again only this time the ps command doesn't
show a bash pid and yet taskmanager thinks it's running.

In other words, taskmanager has a bash running which doesn't show up in
the ps -ef listing.

So, the log processing script ran for about 30 hours before stall. At
least that's better than two.

--
Ken Shaffer



     - - - - - - -  Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.  - - - - - - -  
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential, 
proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The information is 
solely intended for the named addressee (or a person responsible for delivering 
it to the addressee). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, 
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message 
or any part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your computer.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to