On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:58:27 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:31:33AM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:33:22 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >> Does <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC94> help (actually, the part > >> about libm is out of date[*], but the missing main() still applies). > > > >So it no longer matters where you put the -lm? > > libm.a hasn't been a symlink for quite a while. It still matters where > you put it, though.
OK, I just deleted the line about libm.a being a symlink. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
