On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote: >Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package for god >knows how long, and Cygwin isn't the only one thats going to have >them. I'm betting that any distro that has the Fortunes package has >them too.
Right. The README of the package says this: The potentially offensive fortunes are installed by default on FreeBSD systems. If you're absolutely, *positively*, without-a-shadow-of-a-doubt sure that your user community goes berzerk/sues your pants off/drops dead upon reading one of them, edit the Makefile in the subdirectory datfiles, and do "make all install". So, we do undoubtedly have the default version and I am undoubtedly getting more prudish about this type of thing. Maybe we need a vote. I would really like to know how people feel about this. We haven't had a vote in a long time so: How do you feel about the off-color content in the cygwin fortune files? [ ] Offended. Think about the children! [ ] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values. [ ] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this list is now? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
