Search google for "windows high resolution timer" (no quotes) and that will probably give some answers.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:12:37 +0100 (BST), Lionel B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible in Cygwin (W2k, Pentium 4, gcc 3.3.3) to access a higher > resolution (or perhaps I mean "granularity") process CPU timer than the libc > clock() call? I am finding clock() inadequate for some code benchmarking. > > [It is not clear to me whether this is indeed a Cygwin issue, or rather a > Windows issue and therefore OT here - apologies if so]. > > Having browsed the archives, it seems that it may well be possible to access > high-resolution *system* timers (perhaps using NT API calls to > QueryPerformanceCounter() & family), but I can see no way to achieve > per-process timing this way. > > Any pointers appreciated, > > -- > Lionel B > > ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger > - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Robert Pendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
