On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:53:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >I see. But I suppose, for an example described in > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-06/msg00678.html , providing a piece of > >paper with such an offer in the product box should count as fulfilment > >of clause 3b? > So, basically, your question is: "If I distribute the Cygwin DLL under > the precise terms of the GPL will there be a problem?"
Umm, not exactly :) . I've started to doubt whether it was under the precise terms of the GPL. But I've received my answer. > Corinna's reply to this thread was the standard one of expressing doubt > that anyone would adhere to the exact terms of 3b. If you do so, you > must keep the exact sources for the binary that you distributed > somewhere to be made available to anyone who asks. However, if you > think this is an option and want to vault the sources and distribute > your software with a written offer then it should be ok since you > are complying with the intent of 3b. Well, this is not my decision. They want to do it, they know what they are doing. With kind regards, Baurjan. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
