[You left very little context. I added some.] Op Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:00:34 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please op cygwin.com> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Christopher Faylor: > :: We also do not want to export _r functions which are unique only to > :: newlib. For instance, I suspect that _mallopt_r is probably not > :: something that we want to export since no other UNIX has it. : > That's not what was asked... : : Aren't you glad I clarified?
Yeah, sure. But this means I won't be able to help any further with this, as I don't know which UNIXes export which functions,. I hope the lists will help narrow down the search, anyway. [...] : ...apparently not... : -/ (I'll think thrice, before trying to help out here again.) And I asked: Why not export '_mallopt_r' when 'mallopt' is? (I don't think many UNIXes have 'mallopt', and it is newlib- specific...) Maybe l8r, Buzz. -- ) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not -- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for ) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but -- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
