On Mar 23 17:44, Ian Brandt wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >The following checks are performed on the key file in the following order: > > > >- Not Windows NT? Yes -> Don't check permissions. > > I'm running Windows 2000, so this shouldn't catch. > > >- "ntea" switched on? Yes -> Check permissions. (Not applicable on FAT32) > > I don't have it set, and according to the docs it's off by default, and > I'm on FAT32 anyway. > > >- statfs(key_file) fails? Yes -> Check permissions. > > I'm not familiar with this one, but I found a man page for statfs on my > linux server. Unless FAT32 is represented by some cryptic name in the > following file types (MSDOS_SUPER_MAGIC perhaps?), I'm guessing statfs > fails on FAT32?
Not by design. If it fails, it *might* be a bug in Cygwin. Running sshd under strace could give us a clue. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
