At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche you wrote: >Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g. > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html > >(but occasional breakage, e.g. > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html > >) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?
I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug. There has been some good effort to track down the problem, though there's at least still some discussion that needs to occur before we can say the problem is resolved. Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense to document it formally in the FAQ or UG. If it becomes a limitation for some reason, then the UG is likely to be the best place for added documentation, unless the problem actually becomes a FAQ. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
