On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:38:33PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: > At 09:10 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote: > >hey, > > > >I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to > >ldd. > > > >If so, why isn't it called ldd? > > > >If not, what's the equivalent? > > > >I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in > > > >http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html > > > >but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken. > > > Try: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html > > You have a typo in the URL above. >
well, I was there - I'm referring to the link *inside* the message. It points to some site which no longer exists. In any case, why isn't ldd bundled with binutils? Is it just because ldd is implemented on top of objdump? Ed -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
