On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:57:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Sorry, but no. The CVS version of cygwin already has a stub of a fifo >>implementation and the device/fhandler stuff is much different than >>1.5.5. > >But if I change the patch to be compliant with last CVS, should you change >the answer?
Sorry but it's unlikely. As I said, there is already a start of an implementation for this which I am unlikely to want to throw out. I expect to have a working fifo implementation in a couple of releases. It's the next thing I'll work on after fixing the signal/thread problems in the current CVS. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
