On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 01:57:19PM +0100, Alexander Schremmer wrote: >On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:03:24 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:41:02AM +0100, Alexander Schremmer wrote: >>> >>> /---- [JFYI - Sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:] -------------------\ >>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | >>> | Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) | >>> \---------------------------------------------------------------------/ >> >> This is intended. Please keep replies on list. Don't send private email. > >but why does Christopher Faylor send his reply to my address as well? And >why doesn't he use something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] but breaks RFC by supplying >an syntactically correct but not connected address? >How about creating an auto-responder [EMAIL PROTECTED] This situation is >rather confusing.
Not only is it confusing, but it is off-topic. Your inability to comply with my wishes (by setting Reply-To) that you reply to the cygwin mailing list is really not a subject for the mailing list. I cc'ed you because 1) I did not see your name in the subscriber list so I thought that it was likely that you would not see my reply and 2) you did not set a reply-to indicating your preference. Since you didn't seem to like my doing this, I have refrained from cc'ing you in this email since you have indicated a preference. I would ask that you just adhere to my preference as well. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
