It would have been "nice" if there was an acknowledgement of this problem (cygwin's or not) rather than attempted character assassinations.
It has already been acknowledged several times over that it is not a problem of Cygwin's rather a problem of Windows. What else do you want? When you cluelessly continue to assert that it's a Cygwin memory leak is exactly where is leads down the path to character assassinations.
(BTW: Ever think of replacing that Windows box with just a Linux box?)
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
