On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > If I followed the discussion on newlib at sources dot rehat dot com > > correctly, > I'm afraid you haven't followed the discussion correctly. The patch > isn't in yet. > > all required patches are now in CVS and it should, thus, work, without > > applying them manually, right? > Try starting from the link Corinna gave: > >>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2003-03/msg00046.html That's where I started, but I now see I had the time-line reversed: the last message in the thread on newlib at sources dot redhat dot com is http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2003/msg00173.html sent on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:29:29 +0100; the message I thought applied the proper patches was http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2003/msg00151.html sent on Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:42:39 +0100 - a week earlier. (In the thread index, it comes after the message sent a week later, and I didn't pay attention to the dates..)
My fault, sorry :| rlc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
