> > > > > wasn't tight enough. > > > > > > My version: > > > > > > (char *)&relocp->SizeOfBlock < (char *)relocs + size > > > > > > seems to be. > > > > > > > What was the problem with this guard: > > To which guard are you referring? Mine or yours? > > > Does it not fix the last entry of a relocation block ? > > I'm concerned that my guard might have an off-by-one error and miss the > last entry. Is there an easy way to check this?
I have compared this with, what objdump says and it seems there is no difference. I've checked in your changes additional with some debug informations printings in Relocations::check() Regards Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
