Hi Roland, On 4/5/2025 7:56 AM, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:01 PM Christian Franke via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:Testcase for a minor issue: $ > sparse_file $ chattr +S sparse_file $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 conv=sparse,notrunc of=sparse_file ... $ lssparse sparse_file # OK $ lssparse -H sparse_file # OK Hole range[0]: offset=0x0, length=0x100000 $ printf X >> sparse_file $ lssparse sparse_file # OK Data range[1]: offset=0x100000, length=0x1 $ lssparse -H sparse_file # Missing 'Hole range[0]' Data range[1]: offset=0x100000, length=0x1 The condition at lssparse.c:161 is never true: 141 for (i=1 ;;) { ... 161 if (print_holes && (i == 0) && (data_start > 0)) { Possible patch attached. Important: Not tested with other corner cases.1. *Thanks* ... :-) 2. New version is available from http://svn.nrubsig.org/svn/people/gisburn/code/sparsefiles/lssparse.c
This new version has been added to an updated cygutils 1.4.17-3 release as announced in
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-announce/2025-April/012256.html Thanks & Regards, ..mark -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
