On 29/03/2025 16:31, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 3/29/25 04:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What it should do if only the POSIX.1e draft 17 functions are available
is something along these lines:
Yes, that sounds like a better approach. However, shouldn't it use
O_PATH not O_RDONLY? We might lack read access.
Does the attached Gnulib patch work for you? I haven't tested or
installed it (I don't use Cygwin).
Is this patch is OK to be applied to gnulib,
with the tweaks Corinna mentioned?
thanks,
Pádraig
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
