On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Feb 21 14:35, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > 2. This seems to have fixed a severe performance regression in Curl's test > > suite (https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/16217) that I was recently > > looking into. My research tracked it down to c7fe29f ("Cygwin: pipe: > > Restore blocking mode of read pipe on close()/raw_read()"), reverting that > > got performance back to normal. The fhandler/pipe.cc code changed > > significantly in master vs 3.5. > > This sounds a bit ambiguous to me. > > Do you see this performance regression with the latest 3.6.0 test > release, or does it fix this performance regression?
Sorry. Regression introduced between 3.5.4 and 3.5.7 (we skipped 3.5.5 and 3.5.6). "Bisected" (really, educated guess found it on the first try) to c7fe29f. Fixed in 3.6.0. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple