Hi Jeremy, On Tue, 28 May 2024 10:58:00 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 19:29:43 -0700 (PDT) > Jeremy Drake wrote: > > On Fri, 24 May 2024, Jeremy Drake wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 24 May 2024, Jeremy Drake wrote: > > > > > > > Looking at !address, it seems Windows put the PEB, TEBs, and stacks in > > > > the > > > > area where the cygheap should be. Way to go, ASLR :P > > > > > > I think the fix for this would be to add -Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va to > > > ldh_LDFLAGS, as was done for strace and cygcheck at least. I used peflags > > > -d0 /usr/bin/ldh.exe and I'm not seeing a hang after that. > > > > Sorry, that was peflags -e0 not -d0 (dynamicbase is still on): > > $ peflags -v /usr/bin/ldh.exe > > /usr/bin/ldh.exe: > > coff(0x0226[+executable_image,+line_nums_stripped,+bigaddr,+sepdbg]) > > pe(0x0140[+dynamicbase,+nxcompat]) > > You are right! > > It seems that VirtualAlloc() in cygheap_init() in mm/cygheap.cc > fails when the address range which cygwin uses is occupied due to > high-entropy-va in ldh.exe. > > Thanks for the analysis.
Would you make a patch for that? -- Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp> -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
