On Jul 27 20:24, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Jul 27 12:15, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> I'm looking into that. First thing, your testsuite uncovered a bug in
> the latest fnmatch in the C locale. Comparing pointers instead of
> comparing characters was never a good idea for pattern matching...
>
> When I'm done I hope that our 3.5 fnmatch won't be overridden by the
> gnulib version :}
>
> > I can't easily install a Cygwin 3.5.0 snapshot. If one of you would like to
> > help, here's how to:
> > 1. Create an environment for working with a Cygwin 3.5.0 snapshot (from
> > March 2023 or newer).
> > 2. wget https://haible.de/bruno/gnu/testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz
> > 3. tar xfz testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz
> > 4. cd testdir-fnmatch-posix
> > ./configure 2>&1 | tee log1
> > make
> > make check
I fixed the above problem and the POSIX check now works fine:
> > grep fnmatch log1
checking for fnmatch.h... yes
checking for fnmatch... yes
checking for working POSIX fnmatch... yes
I also extraced the fnmatch configure testcase and ran it manually.
It returns 0 now. But:
> > grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status
S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="1"
Looks like the reason is that we don't have a uchar.h file? Seems
like this is of interest for AIX, but why should this be of
interest for fnmatch on other systems?
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple