On Jul 27 20:24, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Jul 27 12:15, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote: > I'm looking into that. First thing, your testsuite uncovered a bug in > the latest fnmatch in the C locale. Comparing pointers instead of > comparing characters was never a good idea for pattern matching... > > When I'm done I hope that our 3.5 fnmatch won't be overridden by the > gnulib version :} > > > I can't easily install a Cygwin 3.5.0 snapshot. If one of you would like to > > help, here's how to: > > 1. Create an environment for working with a Cygwin 3.5.0 snapshot (from > > March 2023 or newer). > > 2. wget https://haible.de/bruno/gnu/testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz > > 3. tar xfz testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz > > 4. cd testdir-fnmatch-posix > > ./configure 2>&1 | tee log1 > > make > > make check
I fixed the above problem and the POSIX check now works fine: > > grep fnmatch log1 checking for fnmatch.h... yes checking for fnmatch... yes checking for working POSIX fnmatch... yes I also extraced the fnmatch configure testcase and ran it manually. It returns 0 now. But: > > grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="1" Looks like the reason is that we don't have a uchar.h file? Seems like this is of interest for AIX, but why should this be of interest for fnmatch on other systems? Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple