On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 11:26:37PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >Steve Minnis wrote: >> Thanks, that was quick. > >Please keep replies on the list. I won't get annoyed if you cc me as well, >but it's unneccesary to do so. > >> Is there any way to get it started in the >> background, in similar fashion. Actually, I have not succeeded in >> getting sshd to run by any means I try. (Yes, I am very much a novice >> when it comes to Unix, but I'm trying...) > >Persuading things to run truly in the background is quite difficult. If you >can guarantee that the user at the physical console won't log off, you can >probably get away with just running sshd and minimizing it. > >I fled the world of Win9x when XP came out, and haven't looked back. (I >realize that this is not necessarily an option. But there are compelling >reasons to forget about 9x if you are able to do so.)
AMEN! cgf (Have I mentioned how much I hate Windows 9x this week?) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
