On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:37:00PM +0000, Jon Turney wrote: > On 16/02/2022 10:40, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > <snip> > > Inevitably a bunch of other maintainers will have their own way of doing > > things; I think Scallywag is the closest thing we have to a common CI/CD > > setup. But hopefully some of this might give you pointers to CI/CD > > tools that require minimal setup and won't even cost you time on your > > own build servers. Or, at the very least, ideas about what you'll need > > to do for your own automation. > > I have no great attachment to the current system. It saves me a bit of time > maintaining my packages, and might be of some benefit to others. > > Long-term, the ambition would be to stop maintainers uploading locally built > packages, because that's not a good idea. > > If you have ideas on improvements which could benefit all package > maintainers (or even everyone who wants to try to build cygwin packages), > and would like to work on that, let me know and I'll sort out access to > sourceware for you.
I'm definitely interested! This sounds like the sort of thing I'd think is a fun time. I don't think I can commit to doing anything on any particular time frame, but I think I'd enjoy working on that sort of infrastructure project and I'd be very glad to contribute. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
