On 2021-03-19 01:53, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:47 AM Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-03-18 14:28, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote:
If these are being renamed should they not now use neutral terminology based on
terms such as primary and secondary, and the primary/default repo branches on a
term such as main?
Yes. Though there are ~700 instances of such terms in the cygwin code
so I'd suggest you propose this separately to the list.
I'm not suggesting anyone even attempt to do a mass clean up of such terms.
But as any area needs work where these terms are used, take the opportunity.
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
