This is mostly over my head, so I'm sorry if my comment here is irrelevant, but I'll point out in case anyone here doesn't know, Python 3 doesn't make Python 2 obsolete. They are somewhat incompatible. Python 2 source doesn't always run in Python 3 without extensive modification. If there's any message you all would like me to deliver to the Bazaar (bzr) forum, I will; but I'm not a Bazaar developer either, just a user.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 9:16 AM Brian Inglis < brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote: > On 2020-06-20 08:41, Jon Turney wrote: > > On 19/06/2020 07:55, Brian Inglis wrote: > > This analysis is not complete or correct because it doesn't take > 'obsoletes:' > > into account: > > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=cygwin-apps/calm.git;a=commitdiff;h=d75abceedb46749982669236c5c102796a1fbfb1;hp=f92ad1d5c292ed54e7a62f5c52280efab8267f37 > > It does seem that things aren't working as intended, though. > > So does that obsoletes: mean something different than category: _obsoletes, > which I view as a (Debian-like) virtual package declaration? > Are obsoletes and pre-depends documented anywhere else (and any other new > keywords)? > > -- > Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada > > This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains > too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. > [Data in IEC units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
